Download a printer-friendly pdf of this Executive Summary.
Clean
Schools, Safe Kids:
Striving for Safer Pest Management
in North Carolina Public Schools.
By Toxic Free NC.
Executive Summary
Children spend 30 to 50% of their
waking hours in school nine months of the year. Schools are
publicly funded institutions dedicated to educating children
and ensuring their successful futures. Schools should be
physically safe and free from health hazards, including unnecessary
toxic chemicals. In recent years, several issues have drawn
greater attention to the role schools play in promoting a
healthy environment
for children, ranging from indoor air quality to school violence.
Pest control is an important component of school environmental
quality which, unlike many other health and safety issues,
is within the power of school officials to improve, and can
even result in cost savings to the school district if implemented
well.
Exposure to pesticides in childhood can have serious impacts on long-term health. Schools can also bear a great deal of liability for immediate injuries to students, faculty, or other staff resulting from improper management of toxic chemicals such as pesticides. Schools can reduce or even eliminate those risks using simple, low-cost methods such as Integrated Pest Management (IPM). With proper training, planning, and effective communication among affected parties, IPM can prevent pest problems, reduce the need for pesticide applications, and greatly improve the quality of the school environment.
Several school districts in North
Carolina are already using IPM to lower the frequency of
pest infestations as well as the cost of pest control. During
the summer of 2003, the Toxic
Free NC surveyed the facilities departments
at all of North Carolina's 117 public school districts regarding
their pest management practices. 60 districts responded,
representing more than half of NC school districts and 1.3
million students in grades K through 12. The survey found
that many schools still use high-risk pest control practices
such as fogging buildings with pesticides or using pesticides
regularly as "prevention." Schools
with least-toxic or IPM programs consistently spent less
than the statewide average on pest control, and tended to
be more satisfied with their pest management programs overall.
Stories from some of these schools, as well as cost comparisons,
are included in this report.
Some of the survey's most interesting findings include:



